試用 OpenCode立即試用

Compare AI models: Muse Spark 1.3 Contributor vs Inkling 2 Small

Muse Spark 1.3 ContributorMeta
Inkling 2 SmallThinking MachinesHollow points use fallbacks · hover for details

ReasoningCodingCost efficiencyContext windowMultimodalTool use

Normalized model capability scores
Model	Reasoning	Coding	Cost efficiency	Context window	Multimodal	Tool use
Muse Spark 1.3 Contributor	100/100	90/100	82/100	92/100	83/100	100/100
Inkling 2 Small	50/100 — Reasoning supported; no comparable benchmark	50/100 — No data; neutral placeholder	71/100	92/100	33/100	50/100 — Tool calling supported; no comparable benchmark

Overview

Author

Thinking Machines

Context length

1M

1M

Reasoning

True

True

Input modalities

Text, Image, Video, Pdf, Audio

Text, Image

Output modalities

Text

Text

Providers

Thinking Machines

Pricing

Input

$0.10/ 1M

$0.15/ 1M

Output

$0.20/ 1M

$0.50/ 1M

Cached input

$0.002/ 1M

$0.03/ 1M

MomentumLast 2 mo

Unique users

1.2M

13K

Completed sessions

257,778,828

286,993

Token share

12.5%

0.33%

Tokens

181T+126%

4.8T+100%

SEP 19NOV 13

SEP 19NOV 13

RetentionWeek 1

Returning users

69.2%55K user-weeks

Pending

Related comparisons. Other model pairs to check.

Nearby alternativeMuse Spark 1.3 Contributor vs Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructMuse Spark 1.3 ContributorDracarys Llama 3.1 70B Instruct Nearby alternativeInkling 2 Small vs Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructInkling 2 SmallDracarys Llama 3.1 70B Instruct Related comparisonMuse Spark 1.3 Contributor vs Jamba MiniMuse Spark 1.3 ContributorJamba Mini Related comparisonInkling 2 Small vs Jamba MiniInkling 2 SmallJamba Mini