Compare AI models: MiniMax-M3.1-Flash vs GLM-5.1
- MiniMax-M3.1-FlashMiniMaxHollow points use fallbacks · hover for details
- GLM-5.1ZhipuHollow points use fallbacks · hover for details
ReasoningCodingCost efficiencyContext windowMultimodalTool use
| Model | Reasoning | Coding | Cost efficiency | Context window | Multimodal | Tool use |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MiniMax-M3.1-Flash | 50/100 — Reasoning supported; no comparable benchmark | 50/100 — No data; neutral placeholder | 69/100 | 81/100 | 50/100 | 50/100 — Tool calling supported; no comparable benchmark |
| GLM-5.1 | 50/100 — Reasoning supported; no comparable benchmark | 88/100 | 33/100 | 46/100 | 0/100 | 45/100 |
Overview
Author
Context length
1M
200K
Reasoning
True
True
Input modalities
Text, Image, Video
Text
Output modalities
Text
Text
Providers
Pricing
Input
$0.15/ 1M
$0.90/ 1M
Output
$0.60/ 1M
$3.59/ 1M
Cached input
$0.01/ 1M
$0.19/ 1M
MomentumLast 2 mo
Unique users
1M
22K
Completed sessions
126,217,053
61,050
Token share
13.6%
0%
Tokens
196T+100%
21B-90%
SEP 19NOV 13
SEP 19NOV 13
RetentionWeek 1
Returning users
72.2%15K user-weeks
42.4%708 user-weeks
Related comparisons. Other model pairs to check.
Nearby alternativeMiniMax-M3.1-Flash vs Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructMiniMax-M3.1-Flash·Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructNearby alternativeGLM-5.1 vs Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructGLM-5.1·Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructRelated comparisonMiniMax-M3.1-Flash vs Jamba MiniMiniMax-M3.1-Flash·Jamba MiniRelated comparisonGLM-5.1 vs Jamba MiniGLM-5.1·Jamba Mini