Compare AI models: MiniMax-M3.1-Flash vs MiMo-V2.5
- MiniMax-M3.1-FlashMiniMaxHollow points use fallbacks · hover for details
- MiMo-V2.5Xiaomi
ReasoningCodingCost efficiencyContext windowMultimodalTool use
| Model | Reasoning | Coding | Cost efficiency | Context window | Multimodal | Tool use |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MiniMax-M3.1-Flash | 50/100 — Reasoning supported; no comparable benchmark | 50/100 — No data; neutral placeholder | 69/100 | 81/100 | 50/100 | 50/100 — Tool calling supported; no comparable benchmark |
| MiMo-V2.5 | 17/100 | 53/100 | 77/100 | 92/100 | 67/100 | 50/100 |
Overview
Author
Context length
1M
1M
Reasoning
True
True
Input modalities
Text, Image, Video
Text, Image, Audio, Video
Output modalities
Text
Text
Providers
Pricing
Input
$0.15/ 1M
$0.14/ 1M
Output
$0.60/ 1M
$0.28/ 1M
Cached input
$0.01/ 1M
$0.003/ 1M
MomentumLast 2 mo
Unique users
1M
230K
Completed sessions
126,217,053
10,935,282
Token share
13.6%
0.44%
Tokens
196T+100%
6.3T-89%
SEP 19NOV 13
SEP 19NOV 13
RetentionWeek 1
Returning users
72.2%15K user-weeks
60.3%10K user-weeks
Related comparisons. Other model pairs to check.
Nearby alternativeMiniMax-M3.1-Flash vs Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructMiniMax-M3.1-Flash·Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructNearby alternativeMiMo-V2.5 vs Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructMiMo-V2.5·Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructRelated comparisonMiniMax-M3.1-Flash vs Jamba MiniMiniMax-M3.1-Flash·Jamba MiniRelated comparisonMiMo-V2.5 vs Jamba MiniMiMo-V2.5·Jamba Mini