Compare AI models: Muse Spark 1.3 Contributor vs MiniMax-M3.1-Flash
- Muse Spark 1.3 ContributorMeta
- MiniMax-M3.1-FlashMiniMaxHollow points use fallbacks · hover for details
ReasoningCodingCost efficiencyContext windowMultimodalTool use
| Model | Reasoning | Coding | Cost efficiency | Context window | Multimodal | Tool use |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Muse Spark 1.3 Contributor | 100/100 | 90/100 | 80/100 | 92/100 | 83/100 | 100/100 |
| MiniMax-M3.1-Flash | 50/100 — Reasoning supported; no comparable benchmark | 50/100 — No data; neutral placeholder | 67/100 | 81/100 | 50/100 | 50/100 — Tool calling supported; no comparable benchmark |
Overview
Author
Context length
1M
1M
Reasoning
True
True
Input modalities
Text, Image, Video, Pdf, Audio
Text, Image, Video
Output modalities
Text
Text
Providers
Pricing
Input
$0.10/ 1M
$0.15/ 1M
Output
$0.20/ 1M
$0.60/ 1M
Cached input
$0.002/ 1M
$0.01/ 1M
MomentumLast 2 mo
Unique users
1.2M
1M
Completed sessions
257,753,772
126,209,558
Token share
12.5%
13.6%
Tokens
181T+126%
196T+100%
SEP 19NOV 13
SEP 19NOV 13
RetentionWeek 1
Returning users
69.2%55K user-weeks
72.2%15K user-weeks
Related comparisons. Other model pairs to check.
Nearby alternativeMuse Spark 1.3 Contributor vs Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructMuse Spark 1.3 Contributor·Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructNearby alternativeMiniMax-M3.1-Flash vs Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructMiniMax-M3.1-Flash·Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructRelated comparisonMuse Spark 1.3 Contributor vs Jamba MiniMuse Spark 1.3 Contributor·Jamba MiniRelated comparisonMiniMax-M3.1-Flash vs Jamba MiniMiniMax-M3.1-Flash·Jamba Mini