Попробовать OpenCodeПопробовать

Compare AI models: Muse Ember vs Inkling 2 Small

Muse EmberMetaHollow points use fallbacks · hover for details
Inkling 2 SmallThinking MachinesHollow points use fallbacks · hover for details

ReasoningCodingCost efficiencyContext windowMultimodalTool use

Normalized model capability scores
Model	Reasoning	Coding	Cost efficiency	Context window	Multimodal	Tool use
Muse Ember	100/100	0/100	71/100	92/100	83/100	50/100 — Tool calling supported; no comparable benchmark
Inkling 2 Small	50/100 — Reasoning supported; no comparable benchmark	50/100 — No data; neutral placeholder	60/100	92/100	33/100	50/100 — Tool calling supported; no comparable benchmark

Overview

Author

Thinking Machines

Context length

1M

1M

Reasoning

True

True

Input modalities

Text, Image, Video, Pdf, Audio

Text, Image

Output modalities

Text

Text

Providers

Thinking Machines

Pricing

Input

$0.10/ 1M

$0.30/ 1M

Output

$0.50/ 1M

$1.00/ 1M

Cached input

$0.004/ 1M

$0.03/ 1M

MomentumLast 2 mo

Unique users

41K

12K

Completed sessions

554,695

285,684

Token share

0.15%

0.33%

Tokens

2.2T+100%

4.7T+100%

SEP 19NOV 13

SEP 19NOV 13

RetentionWeek 1

Returning users

Pending

Pending

Related comparisons. Other model pairs to check.

Nearby alternativeMuse Ember vs Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructMuse EmberDracarys Llama 3.1 70B Instruct Nearby alternativeInkling 2 Small vs Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructInkling 2 SmallDracarys Llama 3.1 70B Instruct Related comparisonMuse Ember vs Jamba MiniMuse EmberJamba Mini Related comparisonInkling 2 Small vs Jamba MiniInkling 2 SmallJamba Mini