Try OpenCodeTry OpenCode

Compare AI models: deepseek-v4.1-flash-1017-op vs Muse Ember

  1. deepseek-v4.1-flash-1017-opDeepSeekHollow points use fallbacks · hover for details
  2. Muse EmberMetaHollow points use fallbacks · hover for details
ReasoningCodingCost efficiencyContext windowMultimodalTool use
Normalized model capability scores
ModelReasoningCodingCost efficiencyContext windowMultimodalTool use
deepseek-v4.1-flash-1017-op50/100 — No data; neutral placeholder50/100 — No data; neutral placeholder50/100 — No data; neutral placeholder50/100 — No data; neutral placeholder50/100 — No data; neutral placeholder50/100 — No data; neutral placeholder
Muse Ember100/1000/10071/10092/10083/10050/100 — Tool calling supported; no comparable benchmark
Overview
Author
Context length
Unknown
1M
Reasoning
Unknown
True
Input modalities
Unknown
Text, Image, Video, Pdf, Audio
Output modalities
Unknown
Text
Providers
Pricing
Input
Unknown
$0.10/ 1M
Output
Unknown
$0.50/ 1M
Cached input
Unknown
$0.004/ 1M
MomentumLast 2 mo
Unique users
59K
41K
Completed sessions
527,983
554,695
Token share
0.15%
0.15%
Tokens
2.2T+100%
2.2T+100%
SEP 19NOV 13
SEP 19NOV 13
RetentionWeek 1
Returning users
Pending
Pending

Related comparisons. Other model pairs to check.