Compare AI models: Claude Haiku 5.5 vs LongCat-2.5
- Claude Haiku 5.5Anthropic
- LongCat-2.5MeituanHollow points use fallbacks · hover for details
ReasoningCodingCost efficiencyContext windowMultimodalTool use
| Model | Reasoning | Coding | Cost efficiency | Context window | Multimodal | Tool use |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 5.5 | 68/100 | 25/100 | 71/100 | 81/100 | 50/100 | 50/100 |
| LongCat-2.5 | 50/100 — Reasoning supported; no comparable benchmark | 50/100 — No data; neutral placeholder | 55/100 | 81/100 | 33/100 | 50/100 — Tool calling supported; no comparable benchmark |
Overview
Author
Context length
1M
1M
Reasoning
True
True
Input modalities
Text, Image, Pdf
Text, Image
Output modalities
Text
Text
Providers
Pricing
Input
$0.10/ 1M
$0.30/ 1M
Output
$0.50/ 1M
$1.20/ 1M
Cached input
$0.01/ 1M
$0.006/ 1M
MomentumLast 2 mo
Unique users
247K
27K
Completed sessions
2,380,975
240,631
Token share
0.14%
0.03%
Tokens
2T+100%
488B+100%
SEP 19NOV 13
SEP 19NOV 13
RetentionWeek 1
Returning users
66.1%7.7K user-weeks
Pending
Related comparisons. Other model pairs to check.
Nearby alternativeClaude Haiku 5.5 vs Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructClaude Haiku 5.5·Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructNearby alternativeLongCat-2.5 vs Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructLongCat-2.5·Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructRelated comparisonClaude Haiku 5.5 vs Jamba MiniClaude Haiku 5.5·Jamba MiniRelated comparisonLongCat-2.5 vs Jamba MiniLongCat-2.5·Jamba Mini